Environmental Impact of Sulfuric Acid Leaching

The electro-winning system [SX-EW] is a step in the right direction as the mining industry attempts to develop methods that have less of an impact on the environment. Really, it's a huge step since it eliminates tailings impoundments, which are unsightly and can cause water pollution, and smelting, which can cause air pollution. It only works on oxide ore, whereas the majority of the ore at Rosemont is sulfide and will not dissolve into solution in a reasonable period of time. Therefore, leaching can be used on some 14% of the ore, or approximately 59 million tons.

Sulfuric acid, the leaching agent, is brought on site in large tankers. The sulfuric acid is diluted and sprayed or dripped over oxide ore, which dissolves the oxidized minerals completely in the solution. The solution, “pregnant” with the dissolved metals, is then piped to the SX-EW plant that separates out the copper into 99% pure bars. The copper is ready with no need for smelting. The waste solution is piped to on-site holding ponds, which are securely lined, awaiting the next load of oxide ore to be placed on the leach pads.

Pads for Leaching Ore with Sulfuric Acid

Ideally, this system is a closed circuit and is considered environmentally safe. However, there are two conduits to environment impact. First, the leach solution is stored in open ponds (until the mine is closed then it is put in barrels and taken to toxic waste dumps). Second, the leach solution and the sulfuric acid can spill as they are piped around the facility. There is data to show that these spills impact groundwater—even two miles away.

1) Toxic Ponds:

As the leach solution is reused, the unwanted metals concentrate into a very toxic solution, which sits out in open ponds, waiting to be piped back to be sprayed on fresh ore on the leach pads.

Holding Ponds for Leach Solution

The data on the table on the following page shows the "Characteristics of Leach Solution, which is a toxic hazard. Whereas these ponds are an inevitable part of mining and are considered to be an improvement over tailings impoundments, it is questionable if they are appropriate for a National Forest setting with its requirements for beneficial use.

Characteristics of Leach Solution in Named Ponds at Sierrita Mine
(Metals measured in mg/ltr)

Facility/Sample Location

Headwall No.1

Bailey Lake

B-Pond

Headwall No. 3

Headwall No. 5

Duval Canal

SX-3 Pond

SX-1 Pond

SX-1
Pond

Reclaim Pond

D-Pond

Headwall No. 2

Date Sampled

4/22/98

4/22/98

4/22/98

4/22/98

4/22/98

9/15/98

4/15/99

4/15/99

4/15/99

4/15/99

6/30/98

9/28/98

Conductance (umhos/cm)

14,800

16,300

8,270

13,100

5,040

2,425

 

629

104,000

3450

2540

25,940

pH, lab

2.2

2.1

3

2.4

4.3

6.9

1.8

7

1.4

10.4

6.3

2.4

Total Dissolved   Solids

47,600

47,500

15,900

41,200

9.890

2140

3870

629

37,000

3270

2270

48,000

  Sulfate

15,300

23,000

9280

24,100

5600

1220

3310

190

35,600

1820

1240

31,100

  Arsenic

0.15

0.15

0.13

<0.1

0.08

ND

0.03

0.06

ND

0.052

0.049

ND

  Calcium

526

522

667

570

518

541

125

68.3

141

645

432

533

  Magnesium

3,740

3680

1380

3580

1070

82.9

95.1

9

176

0.5

32.4

3570

  Sodium

400

405

383

440

393

144

98.4

60.9

147

276

53.1

435

  Potassium

55

65

11

45

17

38.9

19.2

 

490

59.3

19.2

52

  Chloride

3340

3540

2050

3470

51

92

140

16

620

320

170

3090

  Fluoride

270

260

78

200

60

1.4

6

0.9

240

1.3

1.5

200

  Nitrate

5.5

6.8

0.03

9.4

250

1.58

2.38

 

3.6

2.23

0.33

11

  Beryllium

1.08

1.06

0.312

0.98

0.81

0.01

0.0008

0.0008

0.03

ND

ND

0.882

  Cadmium

1.05

1.17

0.522

1.02

0.133

0.015

0.0181

0.0022

0.0392

0.014

0.046

1.11

  Chromium

1.4

1.1

0.1

0.9

ND

ND

0.36

ND

ND

ND

ND

1

  Cobalt

10.5

10.7

3.6

9.5

1.47

0.06

0.21

ND

15.3

ND

ND

10.1

  Copper

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

845

55.3

5700

 

0.51

 

  Iron

743

710

282

411

0.13

49.9

49.5

2.72

342

ND

0.23

612

  Lead

0.012

0.023

0.015

0.021

0.006

0.136

0.0627

0.041

0.298

ND

0.002

ND

  Manganese

486

501

227

465

60.6

6.65

9.27

0.35

23.1

ND

2.53

476

  Molybdenum

1.2

1

>0.5

0.8

0.25

0.6

0.26

0.07

2

3.71

11.3

 


2) Records of spills and their impact on groundwater

Spills at Sierrita Mine (date order with most recent first)

All spills were on-site in mill region, principally due to broken pipes. Leach solution content varies according to the step of the process, as is seen by table above.

Date of spill

Amount of Spill

Content of Spill

4/19/03

8,722 lbs.

Sulfuric acid

1/31/02

39,375 gals.

Sulfuric acid

7/3/01

1,209 lbs.

Sulfuric acid

5/22/00

5,350 gallons

Leach Solution*

5/05/98

40,000 gallons

Leach Solution* (includes copper)

5/04/98

120,000 gallons

Leach Solution* (includes copper)

7/11/97

2,798 lbs

Sulfuric acid

3/29/97

8,000 lbs

Sulfuric acid-93%

8/11/96

100 gallons

Sulfuric acid

7/22/96

3,000 lbs

Sulfuric acid

6/12/96

13,263 lbs

Leach Solution (spent)

3/23/96

3,000 lbs

Sulfuric acid

2/21/96

1,850 lbs

Leach Solution*

1/10/96

2,000 lbs

Sulfuric acid

1/8/96

4,000 lbs

Sulfuric acid

12/19/94

5,000 gallons

Leach Solution*

11/03/94

7,000 gallons

Sulfuric acid

9/19/90

2,000 gallons

Diesel fuel

3/16/90

1,500 gallons

Hydrochloric acid

9/8/88

10 gallons

PCB’s

9/6/88

10 gallons

PCB’s

See actual reports at www.savethesantacruzaquifer.info/Hazardous Material Incident Sierrita.htm

Spills at Bagdad Operations

Since Bagdad operations did not have a railway to the site, the chemicals and copper concentrate had to be trucked in and out of the milling/leaching area. There was a mountainous road that contributed to a number of truck accidents.

Bagdad operation is using an alternative route at this time.

Date of Spill

Amount of Spill

Content of Spill

Owner of Property

12/07/04

7,484 lbs

Leach Solution

On-site

9/10/04

354 gals

Sulfuric Acid

On-site

12/04/00

<200 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State Trust

9/18/00

5,850 gals

Xanthate (flotation chemical)

Federal

3/11/99

?

Cyanides, Acids

Federal

3/07/99

12,000 gals

Effluent (treated ww)

Federal

3/01/99

200 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

2/21/99

misc

Glacial Acetic, Nitric Acid

Federal

7/27/98

?

Sulfuric Acid

State

1/01/98

50,000 lbs

Copper Concentrate

State

12/12/97

40,000 lbs

Copper Concentrate

State

9/17/97

7/7200 lbs

Sulfuric Acid

On-site

6/11/97

50,000 lbs

Copper Concentrate

Bagdad town

3/09/97

1,500 lbs

Sulfuric Acid

On-site

7/18/96

3.57 lbs

Mercury

Bagdad town

6/18/96

3/40,000 lbs

Copper Concentrate

State/Private

8/31/95

35,000 lbs

Copper Concentrate

State

7/21/95

48,100 lbs

Lead Sulfide/Cu Conc.

County

11/22/94

2,100 gals.

Diesel

County

3/02/94

60 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

6/11/93

600 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

5/26/93

200 gals

Diesel

Private prop

2/22/92

1,200 gals

Sulfuric

On-Site

5/09/91

?

Sodium Cyanide

State

9/18/90

13 gals

PCB

On-Site

12/17/87

1,500 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

11/09/87

2/2,500 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

9/20/86

50-60 gals

Sulfuric Acid

State

See actual reports on www.savethesantacruzaquifer.info/Hazardous Material Incident Bagdad.htm

 

Return to Home Page